I've recently started a small position in The Rogers International Commodity Index Agriculture Total Return ETN (RJA). View the prospectus here.
RJA is rather new, just starting out in October. It tracks the RICI-Agriculture Index, which "is an index of 20 commodity futures contracts, representing commodities consumed in the global economy." It "aims to be an effective measure of the price action of raw agriculture materials...around the world."
The positive aspects about investing in agriculture:
1. Worldwide demand for food (grains, livestock) is out pacing production, and is expected to do so for quite a while.
2. Worldwide supply of food is at 30 year lows.
3. An emerging middle class in places like China contributes to rising grain and livestock prices. The new middle class buys more meat, thus raising prices. As livestock feed on grain, grain prices rise also.
4. Grain prices, especially corn, rising because of US Congress' obsession with ethanol.
Positive aspects of investing in RJA:
1. .75% expense ratio and commodities have a negative correlation with the stock market as a whole.
2. As mentioned above, RJA includes some 20 different agriculture commodities.
3. It's a great hedge on inflation.
Here are some negative aspects that I've considered:
1. The commodity market prices can change unpredictably.
2. The publisher of the index may stop publishing, which would make it harder to price the market value of RJA.
3. While diversified over a host of agriculture materials (e.g. cotton, corn, wheat, sugar), it is not a diversifed investment because it is concentrated in the agriculture sector.
4. No dividends.
5. Very low liquidity, at least right now. As of the previous market close of this post, the average dollar trading volume was around $1.5 million.
6. This is an ETN (exchange traded note), not an ETF or a closed end exchange traded fund. It attempts to track an index and is traded on AMEX, but it's a bond. This means that there's issuer risk in the sense that the bank issuing this unsecured debt can default. Here, the issuer is a Swedish bank SEK. It is a quasi governmental entity, so its default risk should be low. Apart from default risk, there is also credit rating risk. That is, if SEK's credit rating is downgraded, RJA's value may decrease even while the underlying index rises.
Other things to consider:
1. If RJA is not diversified enough for you, maybe ELEMENTS Rogers International Commodity ETN (RJI) is. Agriculture is about 1/3 of its holdings, with other commodities, such as metals, natural gas, and oil, making up the rest. View the prospectus here.
Another option includes investing in the Goldman Sachs Commodities Index through iPATH S&P TOTAL RETURN INDEX (GSP), also an ETN. Just as RJI, it is spread out through agriculture, energy, and metals. Its expense ratio is .75%. While this ETN has been around since the 3rd or 4th quarter of 2006, it is still very thinly traded, with an average daily trading volume around $1.3 million. As GSP has been around longer than the Rogers ETNs, it may indicate how RJA and RJI will be traded a year from now--still thinly. However, given rising inflation, investors may become more interested in commodities to diversify their portfolios.
iPATH offers other commodity ETNs, with different allocations and underlying indices. If you are interested, check out their page. In the upper left hand corner you should see a tab labeled "commodities." Clicking on that shows you 11 different ETNs.
2. Some stocks, such as Dupont (DD), Monsanto (MON), and Deere (DE) might be better options for investors, as they offer dividends and more liquidity.
Sponsored link: Futures ALERT Video Click Here
Investing in Agriculture, ETN, Jim Rogers
Posted by D | 1:31 AM | agriculture, Agriculture Index, commodity index, Elements, ETN, inflation, Investing, Jim Rodgers, Jim Rogers, lower dollar, RICI-Agriculture, where to buy | 3 comments »
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)






It would seem to make more sense to invest in a liquid market, like the commodity indexes traded on the NBOT such as the CCI, or the individual ag contracts on the CBOT. I would recommend a cash buffer, for these contracts
Excellent article. Is liquidity really an issue here? I thought while this trades as a stock, the Swiss bank would act like a market maker and arbitrage any difference between the ETN and underlying commodities. Sure, you might lose a very small % in the arbitrage, but I wouldn't think that would be much for liquid commodities. As for the credit risk, I would think you could approximate that with the difference between the banks bonds and treasuries and treat it as an expense.
The equity and bond markets have benefited from a long period of low inflation, but ongoing and massive central bank liquidity injections point to a far less benign environment of elevated inflation ahead. Research by our firm, Agcapita Farmland Investment Partnership (Calgary, Canada based agriculture private equity firm) shows investors must be prepared to rotate into asset classes with different characteristics.
During the last commodity bull market & high inflation period in the 1970’s, equities materially underperformed farmland. Western Canadian farmland went from around $100/acre to $550/acre (550% total return and 176% in inflation adjusted terms), cash held in a money market account barely kept ahead of inflation (6% inflation adjusted return) and the S&P 500 index returned less than 2% per year (a loss of almost 50% in inflation in adjusted terms)
We believe the world is still in the early stages of this current commodity bull market. When agriculture commodities prices are compared against their previous inflation adjusted highs they are significantly discounted implying scope for further increases:
Corn is US$ 5/bushel currently compared to US$16/bushel in 1974,
Wheat is US$ 7/bushel currently compared to US$27/bushel in 1974
Canadian farmland is C$ 660/acre currently compared to C$1,100/acre in 1981
Agcapita’s investment team has over 40 years private equity and fund management experience and over $1 billion in total career transactions. The team currently manages a group of private equity funds with almost CAD$ 100 million of assets under management and previously managed a group of emerging market funds with almost C$500 million in assets for one of the largest banks in Europe.
The Canadian farmland investment premise is driven by several key points:
1. Canadian farmland is high quality: Canada is the third largest wheat exporter in the world and in aggregate one of the largest agricultural producers in the world. The three western Canadian provinces alone have approximately 135 million acres of farmland and produce approximately 20 million tons of wheat a year.
2. Canadian farmland is low cost: Agcapita believes Saskatchewan farmland in particular is an undervalued asset. With an average price of $390 per acre, Saskatchewan farmland is some of the least expensive in the world. The prices in Alberta are almost 3 times higher than Saskatchewan at an average of $1,000.
3. Canada has world class farming infrastructure: Unlike investing in farmland in emerging markets such as Argentina, Brazil or Russia, Canadian farmland is supported by first world storage, processing, and shipping infrastructure. This infrastructure is extremely costly to reproduce.
4. Canada has low political risk: Unlike emerging markets, Canada lacks significant political risk. Canadian farmland owners benefit from a transparent and enforceable title system with no material risk of de jure or, worse yet, de facto expropriation. See recent agriculture export tariffs in Argentina.